Tag Archives: WP

Integrity or Fear. PM Lee, Cabinet prioritise fixing opposition over national agenda

Any doubts as to the level of fear that consumes PM Lee and his ruling People’s Action Party were blown away recently in a week where the full force of the government was directed at attempting to discredit the opposition Workers Party over a series of controversies which are seen by many citizens to be non-issues either manufactured or exaggerated for political gain.

The fear that many assume torments the mind of Lee junior is the ever-increasing probability that his government will suffer a historic reversal in what is expected to be a 2016 general election. The fallout from a significant swing away from the ruling party would likely force many of Lee’s cabinet out of government and also make his own position as PM untenable. Such a shake-up of power in Singapore would be unprecedented in modern times and may well lead to a period of sincere soul-searching on the part of the PAP – soul-searching that may require an admission of and move away from the mistaken politics of the past. The impact of such a process on the reputation and legacy of Lee and the men in white is likely to be damning and it is therefore a fear of losing not just power over Singapore, but the power to protect their own reputations, that consumes many in government today.

Desperation

In their coordinated and wide-ranging attempt to discredit the opposition WP, Lee and his cabinet colleagues left many observers puzzled by their decision to refer to a series of issues that are perceived variously to be old, irrelevant or resolved. That this political attack appears to have been prioritised at the cabinet level over a busy domestic agenda dominated by a stagnant economy, the fallout from the government’s hazardous haze response and an ongoing dengue epidemic was to many observers surprising, but in fact betrayed the desperate depths that the ruling party is willing to dredge in their oft-stated desire to fix political opponents.

The curtain rose on the drama in parliament’s Monday sitting, with Minister for Environment and Water Resources Vivian Balakrishnan re-opening the debate over the cleaning of various hawker centres around Bedok, in spite of government-owned Channel NewsAsia and others having reported the dispute as “resolved” – citing NEA and Hawker Association sources in the process – over a month previously.

Hawker centre cleaning dispute reported "resolved" in June

Hawker centre cleaning dispute reported “resolved” in June

In case anyone thought the Minister had gone off message in dredging up a closed and petty dispute for political sparring, PM Lee himself removed any doubt – and in the process doubled down on the PAP’s dubious obsession with defamation suits – by stating that the Minister enjoyed the full support of the cabinet and was willing to be sued by his political opponents if they saw themselves as having been defamed by any of his utterings in the house. But how PM Lee could justify his Environment Minister – who should be busy responding to both the ongoing dengue and haze crises – devoting so much time to the politicisation of a resolved issue was a question left unanswered.

Beyond expressing the cabinet level support that Vivian Balakrishnan enjoyed for his partisan attack on the opposition, PM Lee further underscored how desperate his party is to score political points on irrelevant topics by revisiting both Pritam Singh’s alleged plagiarism of a blog posting in parliament and questions around the appointment of FMSS in WP controlled town council operations. The latter is particularly ironic since questions around FMSS were last given a public airing in an attempt to distract from awkward questions being asked in the aftermath of the AIM scandal – the role of FMSS as a political punching bag for the PAP is becoming increasingly obvious yet so far public opinion does not appear to have shifted in response to the PM’s pummeling. Furthermore, that the allegation of plagiarism against Mr Singh is now more than sixteen months old reinforces the perception that the government is clutching at straws in an effort to find issues to beat the opposition with. PM Lee is surely aware of but chooses to ignore the fact that Mr Singh pointed out long ago – and has again re-confirmed – that permission to cite the article in question was indeed sought and given.

PM Lee has spoken recently on the importance of having the “right politics” in Singapore, but in this week’s exchanges his party has revealed the usually unspoken but well recognised truth about politics in Singapore – that the PAP obsesses over the destruction of political opponents, obsesses over defamation suits in lieu of the court of public opinion and that the fear of a reversal in 2016 is forcing the ruling party into taking increasingly desperate measures to protect their power. We have seen this in recent attempts to crack down on critical voices online, and we see it in the ongoing political mudslinging over barely relevent issues that are clearly a desperate attempt to discredit the political opposition.

If PM Lee is as confident in his own rhetoric about good politics as he claims to be, perhaps he should step out of the comfort of his GRC and come to Hougang or some other SMC in 2016 and give the nation a lesson in good governance. If on the other hand he is more concerned with remaining in power for his own benefit rather than the good of the nation, one can expect much mud to be slung, many critics to be silenced and many cabinet ministers to contest GRCs in 2016. Time and the court of public opinion will indeed tell.

7 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Have the Worker’s Party forgotten Hougang?

Remember Hougang? It seems WP have already forgotten the Hougang by-election – or at least the most important lesson they should have learnt from it. Eventually their candidate Png Eng Huat came home with an impressive 62% of the vote but for a while it wasn’t clear whether there was going to be a by-election at all. WP were very vocal in asking for PM Lee to call a by-election, and on this they benefited from some opposition unity from the Reform Party who also argued on a couple of occasions [1] that a by-election should be mandatory and not at the PM’s discretion. Ultimately though it seems the most forceful demand for a by-election came from a brave resident of Hougang who was willing to challenge the government in court – Mdm Vellama. Have the WP forgotten about her? Much was made at the last GE about WP’s ‘A Team’ which included one of Singapore’s greatest legal minds – Chen Show Mao – but surprisingly it seems they have been very quiet on Mdm Vellama’s case. One wonders if Chen Show Mao has been helping with this crucial case that helped to push PM Lee into calling the Hougang BE in the first place. Has the ultimate beneficiary of the by-election – Png Eng Huat – contributed anything to the appeal fund? I understand the entire filling fees could have been covered in about two weeks from his MPs allowance.

So what are the WP actually working for? Is their idea of a first world parliament one where we have to beg the PM for a by-election, and then we only get one if he feels like it? What are they doing to support their resident – Mdm Vellama – in this matter? If WP came to power, would they change the law so that by elections are mandatory, or do they want to maintain the status quo and put the discretionary power to call a by-election into their own hands? I’ve been following this case through the online media and I’ve seen that the Reform Party, SDP and NSP have all been publicly supportive – but I haven’t seen anything similar from WP. Why are they so quiet?

If you would like to help Mdm Vellama with the costs of her case, you can read more details here: http://www.tremeritus.com/2012/10/02/legal-fund-appeal-by-mdm-vellama-in-respect-of-hougang-by-election-case-appeal/

[1] http://thereformparty.net/about/press-releases/statement-on-the-hougang-by-election/

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized